The tale of the omnipotent therapist

In a realm of minds, where thoughts took flight,
A therapist wise, in therapeutic light.
Omnipotent she deemed herself, with counsel grand,
Guiding troubled souls across the mental land.
Yet pride consumed her, an arrogant sway,
Till a storm of shadows swept her away.
In the tempest of troubles, her wisdom did wane,
As she grappled with demons, her own mind’s bane.
The therapist, humbled, faced a daunting quest,
Through the valleys of anguish, she sought her best.
No longer omnipotent, but a seeker in pain,
Learning empathy’s depth in the torrential rain.
In the tapestry of souls, a humbler thread,
Waltzing with vulnerability, where wisdom is bred.
Her fate a reminder, a tale to unfold,
Even the mighty must yield to lessons untold.

In the vast landscape of psychotherapy, the allure of an omnipotent psychoanalytic approach can, paradoxically, become a stumbling block rather than a foundation for therapeutic success. The concept of omnipotence in therapy often suggests an excessive sense of power or authority on the part of the therapist, and while expertise is crucial, an unyielding belief in one’s infallibility can be detrimental to the therapeutic relationship.
Firstly, an omnipotent stance can create an unbridgeable chasm between the therapist and the client. In the ideal therapeutic relationship, there exists a delicate balance of power, trust, and vulnerability. When a therapist assumes an all-knowing position, it risks eclipsing the client’s autonomy and inhibiting the open exchange of thoughts and feelings. The client may feel diminished, unheard, or reluctant to express their true concerns, hindering the very essence of therapeutic progress.
Furthermore, an omnipotent psychoanalytic approach can inadvertently magnify the therapist’s unresolved issues. The need for omnipotence often stems from the therapist’s own insecurities or unresolved conflicts. This could manifest as an attempt to maintain a façade of absolute control, masking vulnerabilities or uncertainties within the therapist themselves. The therapeutic space should be a crucible for personal and professional growth for both client and therapist; an acknowledgment of imperfections and a shared journey toward understanding.
As the therapist grapples with their own omnipotence, a profound opportunity for self-reflection arises. Unveiling the layers of personal bias, insecurities, or unresolved issues becomes essential for fostering an authentic therapeutic alliance. Acknowledging fallibility and embracing a more collaborative, humble stance can deepen the therapeutic connection, allowing the therapist to resonate with the client’s struggles in a more genuine and empathetic manner.
In conclusion, an omnipotent psychoanalytic approach, though rooted in a desire for mastery, can jeopardize the very core of therapeutic effectiveness. The therapist’s journey toward self-awareness, humility, and an acknowledgment of their own evolving nature is integral to fostering a therapeutic relationship that thrives on trust, authenticity, and shared growth. The therapeutic space, after all, is a dynamic landscape where the therapist’s vulnerabilities, when embraced and understood, can pave the way for profound healing and transformation.

Unveiling the Depth: The Benefits of Long-Term Psychotherapy Over CBT

In the realm of mental health treatment, both long-term psychotherapy and Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy (CBT) stand as valuable tools. While CBT is renowned for its structured, goal-oriented approach, long-term psychotherapy offers a different perspective, delving into the intricate layers of one’s psyche. In this exploration, I will unveil the benefits of long-term psychotherapy, emphasising the unique advantages it provides over the more succinct CBT approach.

Long-term psychotherapy allows individuals to explore the depths of their emotional landscapes, often reaching the root causes of psychological challenges. Unlike CBT, which primarily focuses on modifying behaviors and thought patterns, long-term therapy seeks to understand the origins of these patterns, fostering lasting transformation.
The extended duration of long-term psychotherapy cultivates a deep, trusting relationship between the therapist and the individual. This rapport provides a secure space for open exploration, enabling individuals to share vulnerable aspects of themselves that may take time to emerge in a shorter-term, solution-focused CBT setting. Long-term therapy also allows for a more holistic understanding of an individual’s life, including their relationships, past experiences, and overarching life narrative. This comprehensive view aids in tailoring therapeutic interventions to address underlying issues, promoting enduring well-being rather than surface-level symptom management. Mental health struggles are often complex and multifaceted. Long-term psychotherapy embraces this complexity, recognizing that meaningful change may require time and a nuanced understanding of the individual. This contrasts with CBT’s more streamlined approach, which may not fully capture the intricacies of certain psychological challenges.

Lastly, long-term therapy provides a platform for ongoing self-discovery and personal growth. Through extended exploration, individuals can develop a deeper awareness of themselves, their patterns of behavior, and their potential for positive change, fostering a stronger foundation for long-lasting well-being.

While CBT remains a valuable and effective therapeutic approach, the benefits of long-term psychotherapy lie in its capacity to delve into the complexities of the human psyche, fostering profound understanding and sustainable personal growth. The choice between these approaches ultimately depends on individual preferences, the nature of the challenges, and the depth of exploration one seeks on their mental health journey.

Hey, should I assimilate or integrate: Navigating cultural dynamics

Navigating Cultural Dynamics.

Immigration has long been a driving force behind the cultural tapestry of nations. When immigrant groups enter a new country, they often undergo processes of assimilation or integration, each with its distinct characteristics. In this article, I will explore the nuances of assimilation and integration, shedding light on how these approaches shape the relationship between newcomers and their adopted homeland.

Assimilation:
Assimilation refers to the process by which individuals or groups adopt the cultural norms, values, and practices of the dominant society to the extent that they become indistinguishable from the majority population. In an assimilationist model, immigrants are encouraged to shed their cultural distinctiveness in favor of embracing the dominant culture entirely. This approach implies a one-way process, with the expectation that newcomers conform to the established societal norms.
Pros of Assimilation:
* Unity: Assimilation can contribute to a sense of unity among the population, fostering a common identity.
* Rapid Integration: Immigrants who assimilate quickly may find it easier to integrate into social, economic, and political spheres.
Cons of Assimilation:
* Cultural Loss: Immigrant groups may experience a loss of their cultural identity, leading to a sense of alienation.
* Exclusion: Assimilation can perpetuate exclusionary practices, marginalizing those who struggle to conform. While assimilation can be a means of societal integration, its effects on the confidence of individuals, particularly those from marginalized communities, warrant careful consideration. People of color often face unique challenges when navigating the assimilation process, and the impact on their confidence can be profound.
* Identity Struggle:
* Assimilation may prompt individuals to grapple with a conflict between preserving their cultural identity and conforming to dominant societal norms. This internal struggle can lead to a diminished sense of self-worth, as individuals may feel pressured to relinquish aspects of their cultural heritage.
* The expectation to assimilate can sometimes result in the erasure of cultural markers that contribute to a person’s identity. This erasure, intentional or not, may leave individuals feeling disconnected from their roots, impacting their confidence in social and professional settings.
* Microaggressions and Bias:
Assimilation does not guarantee immunity from systemic biases and microaggressions. People of color who assimilate may still face discrimination, and the experience of navigating these challenges can erode confidence. Feeling compelled to assimilate to avoid such biases can perpetuate a cycle of self-doubt.
* Code-Switching Challenges:
In an assimilationist environment, people might find themselves constantly code-switching—altering their behavior, language, or appearance based on the cultural context. This constant adaptation can contribute to a sense of imposter syndrome and hinder the development of authentic confidence.
While assimilation is often seen as a pathway to societal acceptance, its impact on the confidence of people cannot be overlooked. Striking a balance that acknowledges and values diverse cultural identities is crucial for fostering a society where individuals can authentically express themselves without compromising their confidence and self-esteem.

Integration:
Integration, on the other hand, emphasizes a two-way process where both the immigrant group and the receiving society adapt to one another. This model recognizes and respects cultural diversity, aiming to create a society where different cultures coexist harmoniously. Integrated societies value the contributions of immigrant communities without pressuring them to abandon their cultural heritage.
Pros of Integration:
* Cultural Diversity: Integration celebrates and preserves the rich tapestry of diverse cultures within a society.
* Social Harmony: Embracing integration can lead to increased social cohesion and reduced intergroup tensions.
Cons of Integration:
* Potential for Fragmentation: In some cases, too much emphasis on cultural differences may lead to fragmented communities with limited interaction.
* Challenges in Policy Implementation: Crafting policies that support integration while respecting cultural diversity can be complex and challenging.

In the ongoing discourse surrounding immigration, the choice between assimilation and integration remains a critical consideration for policymakers and communities alike. Striking a balance that values diversity while fostering a shared sense of identity is key to building resilient and inclusive societies. Ultimately, the approach chosen shapes the narrative of immigrant experiences and influences the social fabric of the nation.

Social Media and its impact on Young Minds.

By Florence Nelson, Streatham and Clapham High.
Work experience Oct 2023

Human beings are social creatures. We rely on the companionship of people to thrive, and the power and strength of our connections has a major impact on our mental health as a whole. Having someone to speak and relate to can help to ease stress, anxiety and even depression, while increasing our confidence and self-worth. On the one hand, it can be said that social media influencers do have an important role in aiding these social connections around mental health, but does this actually help us understand ourselves or does it simply operate as a defence?

Nowadays, many of us rely on various social media platforms, such as Instagram, Facebook, Snapchat and Tiktok. This reliance has developed over time, and has gradually increased. In today’s society, mental health, and having a mental disorder has become more normalised. There are more influencers that use their platform as a way of spreading awareness, but also as a ‘safe space’, to make people feel more comfortable and less alone. An example platform is Tiktok. This app allows people to post up to 3 minute videos of them either speaking or lip syncing to audios. In terms of content related to mental health, people may post things such as: how they cope when their depression or anxiety is particularly bad on a certain day, their daily routine or what they eat in a day etc. Accounts like these attract a certain ‘type’ of audience, and are inevitably addictive. The audience may range in age and gender, however a common variable that they all share is their experience. Although everyone is different, and going through different things, people who are struggling in general, feel as though they have no one to speak to. Thus, they turn to accounts like these, where the content relates to similar things that they are going through. For example, someone with an eating disorder, may watch what others eat in a day, or what they do when their body dysmorphia is bad, and frequently use this as a coping mechanism. Another example may be someone who has severe anxiety, may watch videos of someone talking about what they do to help manage themselves. There are numerous accounts that revolve around mental health, because in today’s society its spoken about more. Content creators in this field receive thousands of views, likes and comments. If you do have this role, receiving this amount of attention can feel rewarding, as you truly believe that your videos and words are influencing those struggling in a positive way. Therefore, the likelihood of them posting more of these videos is positively reinforced, as they are receiving a credit from a large audience. From this, we would surely think that the media and its influencers have a constructive platform in which they benefit those affected by mental health. However, this is not always the case.

While social media platforms do have their benefits, as I mention above, it is important to remember that social media can be more damaging than we think. To begin with, social media can never be a replacement for real-world human connection. It requires in-person contact with others to trigger the hormones that alleviate stress and make you feel happier and healthier. Thus, despite however connected you feel to someone online, it is nowhere near as beneficial as the connections made in person. A large majority of people online may seem like they know what is best for you, but in retrospect, they are mostly just young people, in hope for fame and views. This seems to not be focused enough on. People tend to forget the initial motive as they seek for this relatable content. In the long-run, this can be exceedingly damaging for the youth in today’s society, but also for upcoming generations. These young people are being fed false interpretations and perspectives on mental health as well as disorders. One the one hand, social media can exaggerate disorders. They do this by portraying inaccurately distorted images of mental illnesses that emphasise either dangerousness, criminality and unpredictability. However, in reality, somebody with a mental disorder is much more likely to be a victim than, for example, being referred to as ‘crazy’. Labelling people in this sense can spread a harmful stereotype, and can falsely educate those around us. This fake portrayal and over-exaggeration, moves people with mental disorders under the category of people of whom, we do not routinely interact with. This constant flow of data gives us incessant social cues about the nature of other groups of people, and how we should ‘correctly’ interact with them. Essentially making society more judgemental, which is the last thing we want. Moreover, on the flip side, social media can oversimplify disorders. Coming back to the platform Tiktok. Videos in relation to mental health can underestimate the symptoms and severity of someone with a mental illness. For example, someone on Tiktok may post a short video about how to get out of a slump when you are feeling depressed on a particular day. By implying to the media that ‘being depressed’ is something that you can quickly get out of, is scientifically inaccurate. Someone with extreme depression may not even be able to get out of bed it is that severe. Episodes like these are mainly long-term and the individual may need therapy. So, this ‘over-simplification’ is again, another example of a negative stereotype.

Why do we need to hate?

If I project aggression onto the other she or he is likely to become…the mirror or embodiment of the aggression I am trying to displace onto her or him.

Jacqueline Rose
States of Fantasy

Severe personality problems can often find camouflage. No one thinks “I’m a sadist” or “I’m a malignant narcissist’ or a racist.

They find a belief system, social group or person that validates their most hateful, destructive impulses and construes them as virtues.

The most toxic and hateful people in the world are 100% convinced they fight for what is true and right. They find a way to give free rein to their cruelty, to attack, to treat others cruelly and viciously, they often find allies to cheer them on who also believe they are on the side of all that is true and good.

The psychological processes in this state of mind are splitting, projection & projective identification. Splitting means not recognizing one’s own capacity for hate, cruelty, and destructiveness. The person is blind to the bad in themselves. Instead, they project the badness onto some designated other. And this other person, via the defense of projection, is now seen as the repository of all that is bad and evil and necessary to destroy. That belief is the projection. It clouds all reasonable thought and objectivity.

The person now feels fully justified in unleashing their viciousness and hate on the other person, who is now seen (via projection) as someone monstrous who must be destroyed. If the person who is projected on responds to the provocation with anger, this is now seen as further confirmation of how hateful and destructive they are (this is what is called is “projective identification.”)

The end result is that the projecting defended person can deny their own sadism, cruelty, and hate—while simultaneously acting it out without restraint. And feel themselves to be 100% on the side of truth and right as they do it. Many of us may have been on the receiving end of such behaviours – whether at school, college, our families or workplace. It is a process that can destroy your own certainty and belief in yourself.

What is transmutation and how can we relate it to therapy today?

The concept of transmutation of energy, often associated with psychoanalyst Carl Jung, refers to the process of redirecting emotional or psychic energy from one form to another, often more constructive form. It’s a psychological mechanism aimed at channeling intense emotions, including pain, into productive or creative outlets. Here’s how it works:
Recognition of Intense Emotions: The process begins with the recognition of intense and often uncomfortable emotions, such as pain, anger, or frustration. These emotions can be disruptive when left unaddressed and can negatively impact mental well-being.
Conscious Awareness: The individual consciously acknowledges these emotions rather than repressing or denying them. In many cases, this awareness is facilitated through self-reflection, therapy, or introspective practices.
Understanding the Source: To effectively transmute energy, it’s crucial to understand the source of these emotions. Often, they can be traced back to unresolved issues, past traumas, or unmet needs. Psychoanalysis and therapy can help in exploring these origins.
Finding Creative Outlets: Once the source is identified, the individual seeks constructive and creative outlets for these emotions. This can include various activities such as art, writing, music, physical exercise, or even social activism. These outlets provide a safe space to express and transform the emotional energy.
Transformation and Expression: Through creative or productive endeavors, the individual transforms the raw emotional energy into a different form, often one that can be shared or appreciated by others. For example, a person experiencing emotional pain might write poetry or create artwork that reflects their feelings.
Catharsis and Release: Engaging in these creative or productive activities allows for catharsis, which is the emotional release or purging of intense feelings. This release can be therapeutic and provides a sense of relief and emotional cleansing.
Integration and Healing: The process of transmutation ultimately contributes to personal growth and healing. It allows individuals to integrate their emotional experiences into their overall sense of self, helping them to become more self-aware and resilient.
It’s important to note that transmutation of energy is not about denying or suppressing emotions. Instead, it encourages a healthy and constructive way to deal with powerful emotions, leveraging them as a source of inspiration and creativity. While this concept has roots in psychoanalysis, it has also been embraced in various forms of therapy, mindfulness practices, and self-help techniques as a means of promoting emotional well-being and personal development.

The lengths we go for family.

Amidst the loud, garish, Italian-American Christmas festivities of s2 ep6 of The Bear: “Fishes”, a darkly mesmerising – “car crash”, if you’ve watched you’ll get it – psychoanalytic tale unfolds.

The story through aptly-erratic camera work dives into the hidden struggles of a family on the brink of emotional collapse. As the Berzattos gather around the “Feast of the Seven Fishes”, a volcanic scene ensues, simmering with steam and splashed-sauce, where emotions collide, forks are thrown, and love and responsibility intermingle with shame and death.
The Feast of the Seven Fishes, a symbol of unity, morphs into an undulating liquid mirror reflecting the family’s deepest desires and the hidden turmoil swimming beneath. The Christmas tradition becomes a vessel for the unconscious to manifest, and the archetypes emerge in the festivities, vibrating within their shells barely able to contain their parameters. The holiday cheer is many layers removed from the most perceptive characters and only enthusiastically performed by those too drunk to notice their surroundings.
The disturbingly incessant ticking and ringing of kitchen timers promising some kind of eruption or climax, only to be reset again and again and again with increasingly frayed nerves.
The episode serves as a visceral portrayal of big family dynamics and the invisibility of internal struggle, emotional pain and suicidal ideation under the veil of performing and mirroring one’s family’s perceptions, responsibilities and expectations. It’s a masterpiece in showing how love and the familial bond is not enough when we feel the person we’re loved for being, is no longer our genuine self – or perhaps the blended average of our many selves – in that moment.

As the pots boil over in the Berzatto family Christmas kitchen, we witness the human psyche laid bare, simmering with untold confessions, good and ill-wishes and the splitting of selves; confrontation and escapism seem to impossibly become one. We’re left pondering the knife edge that shame, familial connection and death dance on. And the lengths we go to, not to let that, that pains us, into our conscious fore… even if it means what we’re desperately hiding becomes unwittingly visible to those we love.

Within so many families, love is expressed not by words but in the making of food, in fussing, in “making things lovely”. But where does that leave us when we have no appetite?

Social media – the mental health of teenagers

SOCIAL MEDIA: THE MENTAL HEALTH OF TEENAGERS
By Georgia Coates, work experience, Esher college.

This blog will look at both sides of the argument and attempt to answer the question: does social media lead to a decline in the mental health of teenagers?
Firstly, I feel the largest problem (and the inspiration for this blog) with social media is that teenagers are self-diagnosing themselves with mental health conditions without seeking specialists. ‘Comprehensive Psychiatry’ published a paper arguing that the TikTok videos of people giving detailed descriptions of their tics, symptoms and eating disorders have influenced the thought processes of teenagers, especially younger ones. There’s a hidden niche of Twitter, referred to as EDtwt (Eating disorder twitter) where people post their weight-loss tips, stories about their experiences, and what they call ‘thinspo’ – slender people, predominantly women, who others wish to look like. Exposure to these not-so hidden sides of social media surely infect the minds of impressionable teenagers and therefore can explain the fact that hospital admissions for eating disorders have increased by 84% in the last five years (according to the Royal College of Psychiatrists). Of course, the photoshopped Instagram photos don’t help this image of insecurity, with girls making their waists impossibly small for children to envy. On top of this, there are many ‘pseudo-therapists’ on TikTok who attempt to diagnose their watchers – making jokes, listing vague symptoms and suggesting a disorder with no one-to-one discussion or psychological training (An example: making a video about how being easily distracted probably means one has ADHD, and therefore influencing people into believing they have this without seeking medical advice). Viewpoint Center make an excellent point in their article on the same topic, mentioning that teenagers overestimate what is expected of them, using the example that a younger person may believe that, because they’re socially awkward with people they don’t know, they must have social anxiety. Overall, this phenomenon is dangerous because the excessive categorising of oneself can lead to a very real manifestation of these symptoms – as is indicated by the ‘Self – Fulfilling Prophecy’.
One of the largest negatives to the huge increase in social media usage has been the sensationalising of life. Edited videos of false lives and photoshopped pictures of fun often lead to ‘regular’ people feeling their lives are lacklustre. So many videos of overly romanticised situations float around social media that teenagers are conditioned into having unrealistic expectations about what it’s like to live in the real world. There’s been an ongoing trend since 2016 where creators record a day in their life and post – but many younger people don’t seem to realise how much thought goes into these videos. People meticulously plan what day of their week will be the most exciting, and embellish almost every detail of their life to try and install envy in the viewers (No one is making themselves a full English breakfast every day.) A viral video is currently bouncing around the different platforms, with social media creator ‘hubs.life’ making a ‘day in the life’ video as a man with a regular 9 to 5 job. The responses to this video were primarily younger people expressing fear that their lives will turn this monotonous, boring and uneventful. One twitter user responded by saying ‘This video was so depressing that I teared up watching it.’ – only going further in highlighting that clearly the excessive posts of influencers going on holidays with their friends, shopping in the middle of the week and partying every night have instilled a false sense of the future for teenagers.
Another negative aspect social media has given to people, especially teenagers, is the decline of an attention span, which almost certainly correlates with the supposed decline of mental health in teenagers in the newer generations. The TikTok feature not allowing for videos over three minutes has conditioned younger brains into being unable to watch a longer piece of media for a prolonged period of time without distractions. I myself am also guilty of this fault – I can’t watch a film, even one I am thoroughly enjoying, without playing a game on my phone so that my brain has two things to focus on. The online advise columns seem to suggest a social media detox – something which, while definitely a good idea in the long run, seems to be a foreign and impossible concept to me and my fellow teenagers.
This isn’t just the case with videos – Twitter is responsible for the same problem. The short, snappy texts causes younger people to be more used to getting simple, undetailed information as opposed to reading longer books or articles. This seems to be a large reason why (according to statista.com) 147 minutes per day on average are spent on social media, while the Reuters Institution for the Study of Journalism in Oxford found that 3% of all user’s online time is for the news.

COUNTER
As a teenager and a self-proclaimed social media addict, I feel it is my duty to at least try to defend these platforms. I think it’s a valid argument that perhaps it’s not that more people are falsely diagnosing themselves, but more that there’s more access to information and people feel more comfortable in expressing themselves. Perhaps people feel oppressed in their day to day lives, maybe they don’t have the time or money to see a therapist, and perhaps seeing online videos of people in similar situations can actually increase one’s understanding of themselves. This is the same reason why much more of Generation Z are identifying with different gender identities and experimenting more with their sexualities – Perhaps it’s not necessarily the case that more younger people have mental health problems and are queer, but more that people are now more willing to live their truth in a more open, accepting time. For this argument I can use the oft-used example of left-handed people: the number of left handed people built up gradually in the early 20th century and, by 2000, had plateaued. This isn’t because more people were born left-handed, but because society accepted that there was nothing wrong with these people and so they stopped lying on surveys or trying to hide. The same can be said about mental health.
One of the main counterpoints I would like to put forward is the sense of community that social media gives teenagers. Many younger people who feel unloved, alone and misunderstood, perhaps at school or in their home-life, can find a faction of like-minded individuals. There’s a group for everyone, especially on a platform as used as TikTok – but this blog will focus specifically on ‘BookTok’, a side of TikTok where book lovers come together to their their recommendations and opinions with each other, encouraging younger people to read books in an age where print is in decline. Not only does this improve attention spans, literacy and education, it gives a hobby to those who possibly didn’t feel passionately about anything before. Popular accounts, such as ‘sivanreads’, ‘aymansbooks’ and ‘billreads’ have a collective following of over a million, demonstrating that social media users do have passions and intrigue, and that the more problematic users who are responsible for self diagnosis and mental health issues are actually in the minority. BookTok has increased cultural capital, encouraging the reading of classics and foreign literature (the influx of videos about Toshikazu Kawaguchi are proof of this). I found out about my personal favourite book, ‘The Secret History’ from a TikTok video making a joke about being the ‘Richard’ of their friend group – something that, after reading the book, I wouldn’t wish on my worst enemy. The passionate side of social media is not just limited to books – every show and film will have fan-made edits, every sport and activity will have their own community. In this way, social media actually does not ‘decline’ the mental health of teenagers, but instead builds it up by encouraging hobbies outside of the online platforms. 0
In conclusion, while on a personal level I enjoy using social media and reap the benefits, objectively I do come down on the side that social media does overall lead to a decline in the mental health of teenagers. The parading of influencers living artificial realities, the unrealistic body expectations, and the shortened attention span – all paired with the TikTok ‘therapists’ – lead to the confusion and self diagnosing of young teenagers. And, while I am admittedly a hypocrite who won’t give up my social media usage, I do think I would be a healthier and happier person if I did.

‘Yellowjackets’ and the transformative power of trauma.

I’ve been watching Yellowjackets” a series that follows the story of a group of high school girls who survive a plane crash and are forced to survive in the wilderness. The series explores a wide range of psychological themes and concepts through the complex and multifaceted characters of the show. Many of the themes have strangely reminded me of the trauma I experienced training to become a therapist.

Trauma is one of the central psychological themes in “Yellowjackets”. The plane crash and the girls’ subsequent survival in the wilderness cause significant trauma that has long-lasting effects on the characters’ mental health and behavior. The show portrays the different ways in which individuals cope with these difficulties, with some turning to substance abuse, while others become paranoid and detached from reality.

The series also explores the psychological concept of power dynamics and their influence on group behavior. As the girls struggle to survive in the wilderness, power struggles and rivalries emerge, leading to conflicts and tensions between the characters. The show highlights the ways in which power dynamics can shape group behavior and lead to destructive outcomes.

Additionally, the show touches on the psychological concept of identity and the ways in which trauma can influence one’s sense of self. As the characters struggle to survive in the wilderness, they are forced to confront their own mortality and re-evaluate their priorities and values. This experience leads to a transformation in their sense of self and their understanding of their place in the world.
In some this challenge leads to personal growth and development. As the characters face challenges and obstacles, they are forced to confront their fears and weaknesses and find the strength to overcome them. This process of personal growth and development is a central aspect of the show and provides a powerful message about the resilience of the human spirit.

In the midst of all the challenges the girls face it becomes evident that there is the presence supernatural phenomena in the forest, this raises questions about the nature of reality and the extent to which the characters’ experiences are influenced by their psychological states.
One of the key supernatural elements in the series is the character of Shauna’s visions, which seem to provide her with insights into the future and the fate of the group. These visions could be interpreted as a manifestation of Shauna’s psychological state, as she struggles to cope with the trauma of the plane crash and the challenges of survival in the wilderness. Similarly, Travis’s ghost appears to be a manifestation of the guilt and regret that the characters feel about the events leading up to the plane crash. The ghost’s appearances could be seen as a projection of the characters’ unresolved emotions and their need for closure and redemption.
The supernatural elements also highlight the role of belief systems and their influence on human behavior. For example, the character of Natalie becomes increasingly convinced that the group’s survival is tied to the mystical power of the “Yellowjacket Queen,” leading her to make increasingly extreme decisions in pursuit of this belief. This storyline raises questions about the power of belief and the ways in which it can shape our understanding of reality and influence our behavior.

The characters begin to use sacrifice and rituals as a way to cope with their traumatic experiences and to create a sense of order and control in their chaotic situation. This form of magical thinking or superstition, is a common coping mechanism in situations of extreme stress and uncertainty. The use of rituals are tied to the characters’ belief in the power of the “Yellowjacket Queen” and the mystical forces that they believe are guiding their survival. The rituals and sacrifices that they perform are seen as a way to appease these forces and to ensure their continued protection it also feels like a way to assert control over their environment and to create a sense of order in a chaotic and unpredictable situation. By performing rituals and making sacrifices, they are able to establish a sense of structure and routine in their daily lives, which can be comforting and reassuring in a situation where everything else is uncertain.

However, it also highlights the dangerous potential of belief systems and their influence on human behavior. As the characters become increasingly focused, they become more and more willing to engage in extreme and dangerous behaviors in pursuit of their goals. This storyline raises important questions about the power of belief and the ways in which it can influence our behavior, for better or for worse.

Psychedelics and psychotherapy – the rise of wellbeing ‘gurus’

‘I love sleep. My life has a tendency to fall apart when I’m awake’ Hemingway.

Psychedelics have been used for psychotherapy since the 1950s, but were later prohibited due to political and social pressures. Recently, there has been renewed interest in the use of psychedelics such as LSD, psilocybin, and ayahuasca for the treatment of various mental health conditions.
Studies have shown that these substances have the potential to enhance the effectiveness of psychotherapy in treating conditions such as depression, anxiety, PTSD, addiction, and end-of-life distress. They can help to promote introspection, emotional release, and an altered state of consciousness that can facilitate therapeutic breakthroughs.

Psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy typically involves a preparatory phase, a treatment session under the guidance of a trained therapist, and an integration phase. The treatment session typically involves the administration of a controlled dose of the psychedelic substance in a supportive and safe environment. During this time, the therapist provides guidance and support to help the patient navigate the experience and process any insights or emotions that arise.

While the use of psychedelics for psychotherapy shows promise, it is still considered an experimental treatment and is not currently legal in most countries. It is important to note that psychedelics can produce intense and sometimes unpredictable experiences, and should only be administered under the supervision of trained professionals in a clinical setting.
Overall, the use of psychedelics for psychotherapy is an area of active research and holds promise for improving mental health outcomes for those who are struggling with various conditions.

The use of psychedelics for psychotherapy can potentially create a guru culture in which individuals who have had profound experiences with the substances are seen as possessing special knowledge or insight. This can be problematic if these individuals start to view themselves as authorities or become overly reliant on the psychedelic experience as a means of achieving insight or healing. It is alarming to note our
increasing willingness to hand over our own sovereignty to healers who profess to know or have the thing — this feels largely fuelled by social media and notion of magic solutions to mental and emotional difficulties. It is easy to watch healers who profess to know or have the thing become distorted over time—to go from seeing themselves as a vehicle for whatever wants to come through them, to believing themselves to be the thing that’s coming through.

Many people are drawn to the idea of having a spiritual teacher or guide who can provide them with guidance and support on their path of personal growth and development. However, it is important to be discerning in choosing a teacher or guide and to be aware of the potential pitfalls of giving too much power or authority to any one person.

Ultimately, the use of psychedelics for psychotherapy should be approached with caution and with an awareness of the potential risks and benefits. While it can be a powerful tool for healing and personal growth, it is not a panacea and should only be used under the guidance of a trained professional. In this country we are far from being in a place where this is likely to incorporated into anyone’s therapeutic experience.